Last week's issue of The Economist highlighted what geologists are starting to call the "anthropocene", a new age in the natural world's history that is human-centric. Previous geological categorizations of the world's 4 billion+ year old history put flora and fauna front and center. Humans and man-made products were peripheral to Mother Nature's movements. As we encounter climate change, developing nations' industrial growth and a human population approaching 7 billion, it's clear that our perspective of the environment has to change.
I can't think of any other photographer who so perfectly captures the beauty and gravity of this dilemma than Yann Arthus-Bertrand (four of his photos above). Specializing in aerial photography, he has used his birds-eye-view images to call attention to the endangered relationship between humans and nature.
I was first introduced to Arthus-Bertrand's work when his Earth from Above exhibit was featured in downtown Bangkok. Accompanying his photos were quotes from the World Wildlife Fund.
Reading the Anthropocene article and re-visiting Arthus-Bertrand's portfolio reminded me of this quote, featured in The Sun magazine a couple years ago:
"Myth: we have to save the earth.
Frankly, the earth doesn't need to be saved.
Nature doesn't give a hoot if human beings are here or not.
The planet has survived cataclysmic and catastrophic changes
for millions upon millions of years.
Over that time, it is widely believed, 99 percent of all species have come and gone
while the planet has remained.
Saving the environment is really about saving our environment -
making it safe for ourselves, our children, and the world as we know it.
If more people saw the issue as one of saving themselves,
we would probably see increased motivation and commitment
to actually do so"
- Robert M. Lilienfeld & William L. Rathje
On a similar topic, I was recently captivated by various documentaries focusing on the Man & Biosphere Programme under the umbrella of UNESCO. "http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/ecological-sciences/man-and-biosphere-programme/"
ReplyDeleteThe general idea is to switch from an old vision of fully protecting natural sanctuaries wherein Man would be banned in order to preserve the sanctuary. I personnally do not find this sustainable and Man is fully part of Nature.
Hence this programme moves towards the integration of Man within Sanctuaries, and tries and integrate Man as much as possible, even including revenue generating activities like sustainable fisheries, or forestries or whatever it might be.
Just wanted to share this :)